Oh, my GOD!!! Chris Matthews has got to have to be one of the most prominent, liberal, racist idiots on the planet. Every time I see him on the screen I want to reach out and break things. There is so much wrong in this clip that I could spend the whole YEAR, WRITING DAILY, and never get this clip properly deconstructed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGJ77EXiIaQ
Let me help you on the left wash your brains off of the table and put them back in your heads.
You on the left want to know why the rest of us are angry and I am, I am angry (ha! OUTRAGED, even)…..and I think it is because it boils down to the fact that you people are nuts. We are seeing the rise of the morons. It has taken one hundred years of hard work, but finally the idiots, the morons, the fools, the uneducated, the “low information voters” (also known as idiots) have risen to preeminence, sort of like dead fish floating to the top of a polluted pond.
Our public education system has been cultivating the Chris Matthews’ of this nation for over a century, and now we have to deal with the fact that we have complete fools in control of things that affect our lives. If you listen to the clip you will hear the speakers identify many of the no shit problems with the culture, and then completely disregard their own analysis in favor of people being angry because Obama is black.
BULLSHIT!!!
Listen…….here is why Americans are angry……I can boil this down for you. It ain’t rocket science or I wouldn’t get it.
1. We don’t ‘THINK’ the government, the left is coming after our guns, we KNOW you are because you have TOLD us you are. We don’t live in an ethereal world of concepts; we live in a real world where we not only hear what you say, but see what you do.
2. We don’t give a shit about gay marriage. If two flannel shirt wearing, steel toed boot wearing, 200 pound women want to get ‘married’…I don’t care. At least that action takes two people out of the gene pool that won’t re-produce. We are not mad about gay marriage…..we are mad that you want us to be mad about gay marriage.
3. I think we ARE mad about racism…….YOURS. If you are a white, elite, liberal or a Jesse Jackson clone…….we find your racism offensive.
4. We are mad that every single policy of socialism that you are implementing is failing as you trumpet it as a success.
5. We are mad that you think just because we live in Kansas, or Idaho, or Oregon or Alabama, you think that we do not see the disintegration of our national fabric. We are mad that you think that your living in New York, Chicago, LA, makes you more sophisticated than someone else. I will take living in small town North Carolina, where NOBODY was murdered last year, over living in Chicago where 1.5 people were murdered a day, on average!!!! There is your sophistication.
6. We are mad at the taxes.
7. We are mad at Obamacare - the largest tax ever imposed on mankind.
8. We are mad that the government thinks that it has a right to decide what and how much we can eat and drink.
9. We are mad that our elected leaders cannot recognize a problem, its cause and come up with an appropriate solution. This one is getting particularly offensive. ‘Twenty six people killed in a school shooting by a psycho? NO DRINKS LARGER THAN 16 OZ!!!!!’ Our elected officials can’t figure out shit, from dog catcher to President.
10. We are mad that the Senates’ budget to cut the deficit adds $1 trillion in taxes and includes no cuts in spending.
11. Veterans are mad that the military cut funding for tuition assistance and that the government plans on making their insurance plan too expensive to afford in order to get them into Obamacare, after making promises to them about lifetime coverage to get then so sign on.
12. We are furious you cannot SEE the destruction all this is causing to the once-greatest experiment in freedom ever to grace the earth.
Should I continue? We are not mad because Obama is black, and you need to get this into your head…..we are FURIOUS because you are intellectually and morally bankkrupt!
Clear enough? Can I clarify anything further for you on this issue? We are pissed off at your ideas, your ideals, your moral world view, your elitism and how you think it is your divine right to rule over us as royalty rules over servants.
These liberals never hear a dissenting point of view. Have people disagreed with Chris Matthews? I certainly hope so because the guy is a fool. Has he HEARD that dissention? I seriously doubt it.
Now ask me what I REALLY think!
FIREBIRD: What do you REALLY think?
“Progressives” want to avoid honest debate with factual perspectives. They want to demonize those who don’t agree with them as they can’t win an honest debate. The Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate group itself. It just happens to hate the same people that Chris Matthews hates.
Floyd Corkins, the guy who planned to kill a bunch of people at the Family Research Council offices in Washington, DC and then rub Chick-fil-A sandwiches in their faces as they died, pleaded guilty yesterday. And he admitted that he picked the FRC and several other targets based on a “Hate Map” at the Southern Poverty Law Center website:
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/07/splc-southern-poverty-law-center-or-sending-people-to-liquidate-conservatives/#ixzz2NXNOvtUH
BTW – the government is out to grab our guns, is it not. Wired Sisters fully supports that effort and thinks a constitutional convention is needed to help reach that goal.
Progressives consider Matthews a pinnacle of progressive thought. That much is true. He is a pinnacle of progressive thought. What they want us to ignore is how truly pathetic, dishonest, and hate filled progressive thought is. The pinnacle progressive thought is somewhere in the Marianas Trench.
While Diane Feinstein and Ted Cruz duke it out over which of the Bill of Rights Amendments should be diminished in which ways, Gabby Giffords’ husband Mark Kelly’s move to stock up on both AR-15s and high-capacity semi-autos before any limits are legislated isn’t making it any easier for anyone.
H. M. Stuart
Alexandria
Poor Gabby. She’s used as a bobble head prop and while her husband plays hypocrite.
Funny things about assault rifles. I have a British 303 Lee Enfield with a custom stock sitting in my closet. In WW II it was an assault rifle. Now it’s a rather mundane hunting rifle with minimal value because the ammo is hard to find and it’s not original.
It’s not about protecting lives. It’s about government control over our lives.
It’s about government control over our lives BINGO!
All this talk about the size of magazines is smoke and mirrors. If you are taking a rapid fire weapon out to do bodily harm to as many people as possible, you will surely have more than one previously loaded magazine on your person, and if you are worth a krap in handling ordinance, you can swap out a magazine in 1-2 seconds. Legislating the magazine size is more touchy-feely-liberal-bullshit, accomplishing nothing more than a resume line: I proposed a bill to limit magazine size. Love me! Re-elect me!
FIREBIRD: I am firmly in favor of limiting magazine size. Those things get boring and hard to read after the first ten pages or so, especially for us liberals. If not limiting magazine size, maybe mandating more pictures?
Mark Kelly has totally lost any creds he may have had in the gun debate. Three cheers for Tec Cruz – a Republican with some stones!
1) Where and when have they been seizing guns?
2) See the 2004 election. Read any socially conservative site, better known as your base.
3) Only white, liberal elites are racist? Really? I choose not to discuss race much since the large majority of conservatives and liberals are not especially racist, but it still exists.
4) Which one would that be?
5) Whining about being a victim is unbecoming. While there are some people in NY or CA who look down on the Midwest, that is true for conservatives and liberals both who live in those states. Conversely, there are plenty of folks in the Midwest and non-coastal areas who look down on and make fun of the coastal folks, after all, they arent real Americans.
6) Of course. No one likes paying taxes. Some people believe in being responsible for the debts we have incurred. Others just cut taxes and let the debt rise. Thank you for helping make the latter come true.
7) Largest, but funded. You guys have the record for largest UNFUNDED.
8) In case you missed it, the Bloomberg thing did not pass. (Just so you know, some people are mad that the GOP keeps wanting to butt into our private lives.)
9) Points off for redundancy, but there are two parties at the dance. If you are angry at the incompetence of both parties, I think most of us are with you, except most of us dont enjoy wallowing in our anger.
10) Factually wrong. No wonder you get mad.
11) This veteran has looked at that and found most of it not to be true, just more paranoia. (Unles it has changed recently)
12) Destruction?
In short, you are mad because you lost a couple of elections. Go convince others your ideas are better.
Steve
Where and when have they been seizing guns?
You’re either dumber than a rock or a full-in participant to confiscate guns. Any idiot can see what Feinsten, et al have coming down the pike.
I repeat, where and when? I can link to quotes by social cons who want to run the country using the Bible as law. Aint happening. Neither is anyone taking away guns.
Steve
Straw man! Straw man! Straw man! Straw man! Straw man!
And no, taking away our guns won’t happen…. write that down!
#10: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/342986/sticker-shock-senate-dems-budget-actually-has-15-trillion-tax-hikes-andrew-stiles
oops – doubled up on this one – did a double tap (that’s gun lingo, BTW)
#10 – you don’t have to apologize
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/342986/sticker-shock-senate-dems-budget-actually-has-15-trillion-tax-hikes-andrew-stiles
#1 Ummmm….. English grammar 101: ‘is coming’ does not mean the same thing as ‘has come’…. Keep up
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/03/paul-ryans-gop-budget-vs-the-senate-democrats-budget-in-1-graph/274025/
The Dem proposal has a trillion in cuts and a trillion in new taxes. Never heard of this Stiles guy.
#7 – FUNDED???? OBAMACARE!!!??? ROFLMAO! (sorry, jack) That would be with the largest tax on mankind in the history of mankind? Funded? You cannot be serious!
Using CBO numbers. Of note, it is funded the way the GOP has generally wanted to fund it, by eliminating the tax expenditure for health care. (BTW, you need to be consistent. You can say it is the biggest tax ever, or it is not funded. Not both.)
Do you have a professional degree in dumbass? Because seriously, and I am trying to be gentle with you, you may need to go to SAMS to get an industrial roll of tin foil for your hat.
1. In THIS nation, no seized guns yet. In THIS nation, every intention to seize guns. In other nations, Germany, China, Russia, lot’s of seized guns and lot’s of dead bodies until the populace came into order. Don’t be a dumbass…..or DO read history……you figure it out.
2. What is your fucking point in this sentence……
3. This para makes little sense. Actually it makes NO sense since you make no point……up your game a bit liberal…..
I was going to continue……but I am pretty sure that the chemicals in which your brain is soaked cannot be washed off.
FIREBIRD: Lord knows I don’t want to tick you off further–that’s quite an impressive list of “mads” you’ve got going–but as a self-described progressive,I beg you–please, please don’t lump me in with Chris Matthews! You can group me with Elizabeth Warren and Van Jones if you like, and with Rachel Maddow and Chris Hayes and Ezra Klein any day of the week, but please don’t make me defend Chris Matthews, because I can’t and I won’t. When DADvocate claims that “Progressives consider Matthews a pinnacle of progressive thought,” I assume that just means that DADvocate doesn’t know or talk to any actual progressives, because I know lots of them and they all think Matthews is a buffoon.
As for guns: I would like to see proof of the charge that liberals/progressives/Democrats have proposed coming to take anyone’s guns away, as opposed to trying to restrict future gun purchases–which may or may not be sensible policy, but even if implemented would not involved “taking guns away” from folks who have them.
Finally, here is my list of things that currently make me mad:
I’m kind of an easy-going guy, I guess. Even when people tell me I’m morally and intellectually bankrupt, I just shrug. For that matter, DADvocate called me an asshole earlier today and I’m not mad at him–why would I be? Is there some reason in particular why folks are all riled up today? Is it the new pope who’s got you and DADvocate so darn grumpy?
Guns: I would like to see proof of the charge that liberals/progressives/Democrats have proposed coming to take anyone’s guns away
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/24/1077374/-Yes-conservatives-we-want-to-take-away-your-guns
FIREBIRD: Perhaps my use of the word “anyone” was ill-advised; liberals do want to get guns out of the hands of some people. I think that the Daily Kos article sets out some categories of people who, it is widely believed, ought not have access to guns, and it specifies some kinds of guns that some people think shouldn’t even be sold. The same article makes it quite clear that probably 99% of people who have guns can keep their guns and can even buy more. I guess I should have asked for proof that anyone has proposed coming to take “your”guns away, FIREBIRD, since I doubt you fit any of the categories in question. I realize we’ll still disagree about this, but I just wish that we could drop the meme of “liberals want to take everyone’s guns”. There may be some liberals who wish guns didn’t exist, but I’ve never heard any liberal (or anyone else) propose any sort of mass confiscation of weapons in this country. It would be, among other things, lunacy to try such a thing.
LOL. Some anonymous guy? Ok, I agree, there are some liberals who want to take guns away. There are also social cons who really do want to stone to death adulterers and homosexuals. Neither is happening.
TO STEVE:
In short, you are mad because you lost a couple of elections. Go convince others your ideas are better.
1-12: Pffffftttttttttttt!
TO JACK:
You can group me with Elizabeth Warren and Van Jones if you like, and with Rachel Maddow and Chris Hayes and Ezra Klein any day of the week
CONSIDER IT DONE – I REST MY CASE!
I would like to see proof of the charge that liberals/progressives/Democrats have proposed coming to take anyone’s guns away
EVER HEARD OF DIANNE FEINSTEIN?
Even when people tell me I’m morally and intellectually bankrupt, I just shrug…
LMAO! SO I’M NOT THE ONLY ONE? HAVE YOU EVER CONSIDERED LOOKING AT YOURSELF AND QUESTIONING WHY PEOPLE SAY YOU ARE MORALLY AND INTELLECTUALLY BANKRUPT?
FIREBIRD: Re Feinstein: She’s coming for someone’s guns? When will she be arriving?
Re LMAO: No, I just consider the source.
Re typing in all caps: You’re aware that you don’t prove your point that way, right?
Sorry – will refrain from using CAPS – I feared that you had trouble
readingunderstanding what I was sayingFIREBIRD: Apology accepted,though I’m not sure how you thought CAPITAL LETTERS would help me understand.
Here’s what current gun confiscation looks like.
Here’s what pending gun confiscation looks like.
H. M. Stuart
Alexandria
Actually, the current drafts of the California laws would appear to be inelegant and inefficient.
A more concise course would be to declare owning or evincing an interest in owning the firearm fetish du jour statutorially ipso facto evidence of mental illness, thus automatically placing the individual in the Prohibited Armed Persons File where his ownership of a firearm would constitute a permanent crime of either action or intent.
H. M. Stuart
Alexandria
H.M.: That is indeed a brilliant and elegant solution! It’s further proof of how stupid liberals are that we haven’t thought of it ourselves.
H.M.: Thank you sir. I don’t find it outrageous that convicted felons or folks with a history of mental illness are being denied guns, but I concede that there is some small element of “confiscation” involved and/or proposed. Of course, we’re only talking about California, and who in their right mind would want to live there anyway?
Um…other places are boring?
Moro: I apologize for the unintended insult. You’re welcome to visit Montana, though; we’re lots of things but we sure aren’t boring.
Heh, I’m sorry too. I would love to go to Montana sometime, and I’ll gladly admit that California can be pretty dumb. (Thing is, I grew up in Delaware, which actually IS boring, so that tends to color my judgement.)
With respect to the first item above, let us play Truth or Unintended Consequences.
Q: What is the foreseeable outcome of California’s Prohibited Armed Persons-type legislation?
A: Any rational firearms owner not wanting to have his spouse forced to sleep in the back yard or, worse, have his firearms confiscated will treat any potential encounter at all with the mental health industry the way a dog treats a trip to the vet: sure to end in tears, castration, or euthanasia.
“No, Doc, I wouldn’t own a gun if you gave me one. No, Doc, I’m chipper as a bluebird, every minute of every day. May I go now? Promise I’ll eat less bacon, too.”
H. M. Stuart
Alexandria
H.M.: I agree–and so do many mental health professionals–that there may well be unintended consequences from casting too wide a net in trying to keep guns out of the hands of people with mental illness (which category is a wide enough net as it is). So by all means it would be good to slow down and consider those consequences before rushing any legislation through. Of course, there are also unintended consequences to leaving guns in the hands of unstable persons…it’s a dilemma, at least in my opinion.
An old law, not something new. Besides, it was you guys wanting to take guns away from the mentally ill. If you are now proposing that the mentally ill keep their guns, just say so.
The last three shooters (note all lower case)
FIREBIRD: First, thanks for not SHOUTING at me. Those guys sure do look goofy. I’d hate to pass them on the street, although here in Missoula, they really wouldn’t stand out. But I’d hate even more for them to come bursting into my workplace/local mall/favorite bar armed to the teeth. Is it possible that there are two problems–a mental health problem and a gun problem? I’m all for working on them both.
Nope – I can’t agree, Jack. Guns don’t kill people.
I keep guns in the house for self defense so I can kill someone if needed. What do you keep in the house since guns dont kill people?
Steve
*smacks forehead* Guns kill people if people pull the trigger – if you know of an ‘automatic’ that I can buy and say “Gun! Shoot the mofo breaking down my door!!!” I will buy several, as well as stock in the company making them!
Gawd, Steve – you are more fun than pannies full of itching powder!
FIREBIRD: Don’t look now, but I believe the President has such fully automatic robo-guns at his disposal. It’s only a matter of time before either (a) we get our own robo-guns to protect ourselves or (b) the President uses his robo-guns to kill us all. God save this precious land. Now please excuse me; I feel a strange itch coming on. *scratches self*
Wow……..you got some input on this one……..wish I could do that. *clink*.
ROFLMAO! HEY, DARK KNIGHT’…. yeah – *clink* right backatcha! Stick with me – I have great sources! HAHAHA!
Moro: I know someone who is from Delaware, and he’s a great guy (he’s in the state of Washington now, with a brand new baby). I understand that scrapple is very important in Delaware? At least that’s what he and his mom tell me. I’m always asking them about Joe Biden, but they deny knowing him…
I didn’t encounter scrapple till the U of D dining hall. (My dad is half Italian, I’m not sure if they eat it.) I’m not proud of this, but I discovered that I liked it with some maple syrup drizzled on top.
Joe Biden came and gave a talk at my High School, but he didn’t really make a big impression.